Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes - 22 December 2003 [Archived]
OUT OF DATE?
Here in the Vault, information is published in its final form and then not changed or updated. As a result, some content, specifically links to other pages and other references, may be out-of-date or no longer available.
Teleconference
Attendees:
Trustees:
- John Curran, Chairman
- Scott Bradner, Secretary
- David Conrad, Trustee
- Lee Howard, Treasurer
- Bill Manning, Trustee
- Ray Plzak, President
- Bill Woodcock, Trustee
ARIN Staff:
- Thérèse Colosi, Recording Secretary
- Richard Jimmerson, Director, Operations
ARIN Counsel:
- Steve Ryan
1. Welcome
The Chair called the meeting to order at 4:13 p.m. EST. Roll call was taken, and the presence of a quorum was noted.
2. Agenda Bashing.
The Chair asked if there were any comments. There were no comments.
3. Policy Proposal 2002-3: Micro-Assignments for Multi-homed Networks.
Scott Bradner moved that:
“The ARIN Board of Trustees, based on the recommendation of the Advisory Council, and noting that the Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process has been followed, adopt Policy Proposal 2002-3: Micro-Assignments for Multi-homed Networks.”
This was seconded by Bill Manning. The Chair called for comments. There were no comments. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously.
4. Policy Proposal 2003-3: Residential Customer Privacy.
Scott Bradner moved that:
“The ARIN Board of Trustees, based on the recommendation of the Advisory Council, and noting that the Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process has been followed, adopt Policy Proposal 2003-3: Residential Customer Privacy.”
This was seconded by David Conrad. The Chair called for comments. It was noted by the Board that consensus had not been reached on this proposal. Scott Bradner volunteered to withdraw the motion if the proposal needed to go back to the AC for further review. Richard Jimmerson summarized the mailing list discussion for the Board’s information stating that Canadian zip codes had not been discussed on the list. It was the sense of the Board that this was an important issue. Scott Bradner stated that extended zip codes in the U.S. are equivalent to Canadian zip codes and suggested that the AC discuss this issue. All agreed.
Scott Bradner withdrew his motion, and the Board directed the President to contact the AC stating that the Board was concerned: that the policy ensure parity between different access technologies (DSL and cable modems); that a proper discussion had not been held on the Canadian zip code observation; and, the Board was concerned that the discussion on the PPML did not show strong enough support for the proposal.
The Chair asked if there were any objections to the motion being withdrawn. There were no objections.
Bill Woodcock moved that:
“The ARIN Board of Trustees, having reviewed the Policy Proposal 2003-3: Residential Customer Privacy, refer this policy back to the ARIN Advisory Council to consider the aspects of privacy with respect to zip code; agnostic to access technology; and, level of support.”
This was seconded by Scott Bradner. The Chair called for comments. Bill Manning stated that it should be noted that there are different concerns throughout the ARIN region, not just Canada and the U.S. and that the concerns in other parts of the region need to be understood as well. All agreed. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously.
5. Policy Proposal 2003-5: RWhois Server Uses Requirements.
Scott Bradner moved that:
“The ARIN Board of Trustees, based on the recommendation of the Advisory Council, and noting that the Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process has been followed, adopt Policy Proposal 2003-5: RWhois Server Uses Requirements, as modified.”
This was seconded by David Conrad. Scott Bradner mentioned that the issue of zip codes was also relevant in this proposal as well. Lee Howard suggested that SWIP requirements be followed. After discussion it was the sense of the Board that since this proposal depended upon PP 2003-3, it would be discussed after PP 2003-3 is finalized. It was agreed to table the discussion for PP 2003-5 to a future meeting.
Scott Bradner withdrew the motion and there were no objections.
6. Policy Proposal 2003-12: IANA to RIR Allocation of IPv4 Addresses.
Scott Bradner moved that:
“The ARIN Board of Trustees, based on the recommendation of the Advisory Council, and noting that the Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process has been followed, adopt Policy Proposal 2003-12: IANA to RIR Allocation of IPv4 Addresses.”
This was seconded by Lee Howard. The Chair called for comments. Scott Bradner asked for a recap of the changes the ARIN Advisory Council made to the proposal. Ray Plzak stated that there was rewording of the calculation of available supply, but this did not change the meaning of the text. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously.
Ray Plzak stated that he would notify the other RIRs of this motion due to this being a global policy, and the first one to be approved by the ARIN Board.
7. Policy Proposal 2003-13: Six-month Supply of IP Addresses.
Scott Bradner moved that:
“The ARIN Board of Trustees, based on the recommendation of the Advisory Council, and noting that the Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process has been followed, adopt Policy Proposal 2003-13: Six-month Supply of IP Addresses.”
This was seconded by Lee Howard. The Chair called for comments. There were no comments. A roll call vote was taken. The motion passed: 6 in favor; 1 abstention (John Curran).
8. Policy Proposal 2003-14: Remove /13 Maximum Allocation.
Scott Bradner moved that:
“The ARIN Board of Trustees, based on the recommendation of the Advisory Council, and noting that the Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process has been followed, adopt Policy Proposal 2003-14: Remove /13 Maximum Allocation.”
This was seconded by Lee Howard. The Chair called for comments. There were no comments. The motion passed: 5 in favor; 2 abstentions (John Curran and Bill Manning).
9. Policy Proposal 2003-15: IPv4 Allocation Policy for the Africa Portion of the ARIN Region.
Scott Bradner moved that:
“The ARIN Board of Trustees, based on the recommendation of the Advisory Council, and noting that the Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process has been followed, adopt Policy Proposal 2003-15: IPv4 Allocation Policy for the Africa Portion of the ARIN Region.”
This was seconded by Ray Plzak. The Chair called for comments. The Board noted the spirited discussion that had taken place on the PPML regarding this topic. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously.
Ray Plzak stated that ARIN staff would be implementing this policy immediately.
10. Discussion of the Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process.
Scott Bradner moved that:
“The ARIN Board of Trustees, based on the recommendation of the Advisory Council, and noting that a fair and open evaluation process has been followed, adopts the revised Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process.”
This was seconded by Lee Howard. The Chair called for comments. There were no comments. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously.
11. Registration Services Agreement (RSA).
Discussion ensued. The Board noted the clarity of this revised document, however, felt that a few minor revisions still had to be made. The Chair asked Counsel to come up with the recommended wording for the changes, and to have the document ready for the next Board meeting on January 5, 2004. Counsel agreed.
The Chair called for any further comments. There were no further comments.
12. Any Other Business.
The Chair asked if there was any other business to discuss. The Board reconfirmed their next meeting was January 5, 2004 at 4:00 p.m. EST via teleconference. There were no further comments.
13. Adjournment.
Scott Bradner moved to adjourn. This was seconded by David Conrad. The motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 4:56 p.m. EST.
OUT OF DATE?
Here in the Vault, information is published in its final form and then not changed or updated. As a result, some content, specifically links to other pages and other references, may be out-of-date or no longer available.